Over 6,000 sign #SaveTableMountain petition, SANParks disagrees

As a Change.org petition titled #SaveTableMountain gains more traction, with more than 6,000 signatures thus far, SANParks believes the petition is misleading.

The petition, launched by Friends of Table Mountain, accuses SANParks of mismanagement and under-resourcing, claiming this has led to “widespread deterioration and neglect” at the national park. The petition is calling for accountability and urgent action to protect the natural landmark.

“Join our urgent call for comprehensive action to restore and protect this irreplaceable natural asset for current and future generations. As concerned mountain users and community members, we believe it’s our right and responsibility to demand accountability and action,” the petition reads.

The campaign cites high crime rates, decaying infrastructure, insufficient signage and runaway fires as key issues.

READ MORE: #SaveTableMountain on Change.org

The group warns that this mismanagement “threatens the park’s ecological integrity, visitor safety and tourism potential”, urging SANParks to provide a transparent resourcing plan, improve safety measures, and revive crumbling tourism facilities.

ALSO READ: Camps Bay police seek suspect who attacked woman on Table Mountain

In response, JP Louw, SANParks Head of Communications, dismissed the petition, claiming that it is contrary to the independent assessment of the site. Referring to an independent assessment by Conservation Outcome, Louw noted that TMNP scored 75% overall on its management performance.

“This report provides us with factual and objective information which allows for SANParks to continue… based on science and evidence-based detail.”

Louw further disputed several other claims in the petition, noting that figures for crime have dropped, that fires are mostly caused by arsonists and that infrastructure refurbishment is underway.

“The organisations concerned are encouraged to rather continue with a relationship that is constructive and collaborative in nature as opposed to acrimony and misleading information,” said Louw.