Springboks lose banned Erasmus, Du Toit

Published on


Add Smile FM on Google

 

The Springboks will be without two of their stalwarts for the rest of the year after both Rassie Erasmus and Pieter-Steph du Toit received match bans.

 

World Rugby has set a president. You are not allowed to criticize referees on their performance, no matter how inconsistent the officiating.

 

 

 

The World Rugby statement reads:

 

“Match officials are the backbone of the sport, and without them, there is no game. World Rugby condemns any public criticism of match official selection, performance or integrity, which undermines their role, the trust-based coach/match officials feedback process and the values of integrity, respect, solidarity and discipline that are at the heart of the sport.”

 

What did Rassie Erasmus post?

Erasmus sent out a series of tweets following the Springboks’ 26-30 defeat to France on Saturday evening. According to Rassie, his tweets were for Springbok supporters “so our South African fans can understand”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Statement from World Rugby further read:

“World Rugby has reviewed the recent social media posts by SA Rugby Director of Rugby, Rassie Erasmus that relate to match officiating in the Autumn Nations Series.

 

“The behaviour of coaching staff and match officials are widely observed by fans, media and participants at every level, and such behaviours affect how the values are applied across the game.”

 

Rassie will not be allowed to “take part in any match day activity” in the Springboks’ remaining two tests. He will also not be allowed to engage with the media and social media “in relation to match officials”.

 

Pieter-Steph du Toit avoids a lengthy ban

The Springboks giant, Pieter-Steph du Toits’ sanction is very similar to Rassie Erasmus’ ban. The loose forwards squeaky clean record saw him escape a potential six-match ban.

 

The 2019 World Rugby men’s Player of the Year had a red card shown his way just 11-minutes into the test.

 

Related article – Pieter-Steph du Toit unlucky to see red

 

The World Rugby Independent Disciplinary Committee gathered earlier this week to rule on Pieter-Steph’s actions. The Committee was chaired by Australia’s Stephen Hardy and joined by the former International coach Frank Hadden and former Wallaby, John Langford. They found that the Springbok loose forward’s actions were “reckless” and not intentional or deliberate.

 

Although they did acknowledge that external factors were identified, it did not justify downgrading the sanction to a yellow card.

 

In a statement released by SA Rugby, they confirmed that Du Toit was en route to a lengthy ban.

 

“Given Du Toit’s offending involved head contact with an opposition player, the judicial committee applied World Rugby’s mandatory minimum mid-range entry point for foul play in breach of Law 9.11 resulting in contact with the head.

 

“This resulted in a starting point of a six-week/match suspension.”

 

The committee reduced the action because of “mitigating factors” like his “remorse, contrition, exemplary prior disciplinary record and conduct during the hearing”. That saw the ban halved to three weeks.

 

The penalty could be reduced to two weeks if Du Toit attends the Coaching Intervention Programme.

 

That will see PSDT miss the Springboks test against Italy on Saturday, 19 November, and the test against England on 26 November. The third match Du Toit is set to miss out on will be confirmed.

 

Latest articles

IEC Opens Applications for Special Votes

  If you already know you won't be able to make it to your voting station on 4 November, don't panic. There is another option.   The...

Free access to City nature reserves over Heritage weekend

Cape Town residents are invited to explore the city's natural heritage, with free entry to the City's nature reserves from Thursday, 24 September to...

Could this be Heritage Day’s signature drink?

  Heritage Day has its food sorted. There’s the braai, of course, along with family recipes, generous tables and the inevitable debate over who makes...